As far as I know, this is right:
<div>
<p>some words</p>
</div>
But this is wrong:
<p>
<div>some words</div>
</p>
The first one can pass the W3C validator (XHTML 1.0), but the second can't. I know that nobody will write code like the second one. I just want know why.
And what about other tags' containment relationship?
Solution 1
An authoritative place to look for allowed containment relations is the HTML spec. See, for example, http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd.html. It specifies which elements are block elements and which are inline. For those lists, search for the section marked "HTML content models".
For the P element, it specifies the following, which indicates that P elements are only allowed to contain inline elements.
<!ELEMENT P - O (%inline;)* -- paragraph -->
This is consistent with http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/text.html#h-9.3.1, which says that the P element "cannot contain block-level elements (including P itself)."
Solution 2
In short, it is impossible to place a <div> element inside a <p> in the DOM because the opening <div> tag will automatically close the <p> element.
Solution 3
According to HTML5, the content model of div elements is flow content
Most elements that are used in the body of documents and applications are categorized as flow content.
That includes p elements, which can only be used where flow content is expected.
Therefore, div elements can contain p elements.
However, the content model of p elements is Phrasing content
Phrasing content is the text of the document, as well as elements that mark up that text at the intra-paragraph level. Runs of phrasing content form paragraphs.
That doesn't include div elements, which can only be used where flow content is expected.
Therefore, p elements can't contain div elements.
Since the end tag of p elements can be omitted when the p element is immediately followed by a div element (among others), the following
<p>
<div>some words</div>
</p>
is parsed as
<p></p>
<div>some words</div>
</p>
and the last </p> is an error.
Solution 4
Look at this example from the HTML spec
<!-- Example of data from the client database: -->
<!-- Name: Stephane Boyera, Tel: (212) 555-1212, Email: sb@foo.org -->
<DIV id="client-boyera" class="client">
<P><SPAN class="client-title">Client information:</SPAN>
<TABLE class="client-data">
<TR><TH>Last name:<TD>Boyera</TR>
<TR><TH>First name:<TD>Stephane</TR>
<TR><TH>Tel:<TD>(212) 555-1212</TR>
<TR><TH>Email:<TD>sb@foo.org</TR>
</TABLE>
</DIV>
Did you notice something? : There was no closing tag of the <p> element. a mistake in the specs ? No.
Tip #1: The closing tag of <p> is OPTIONAL
You may ask: But then how would a <p> element knows where to stop?
From w3docs:
If the closing tag is omitted, it is considered that the end of the paragraph matches with the start of the next block-level element.
In simple words: a <div> is a block element and its opening tag will cause the parent <p> to be closed, thus <div> can never be nested inside <p>.
BUT what about the inverse situation ? you may ask
well ...
Tip #2: The closing tag of the <div> element is REQUIRED
According to OReilly HTML and XHTML Pocket Reference, Fourth Edition (page 50)
<div> . . . </div>Start/End Tags Required/Required
That is, the <div> element's end will only be determined by its closing tag </div> hence a <p> element inside is will NOT break it.
Solution 5
After the X HTML, the conventions has been changed, and now it's a mixture of conventions of XML and HTML, so that is why the second approach is wrong and the W3C validator accepts the things correct that are according to the standards and conventions.
Solution 6
Because the div tag has higher precedence than the p tag. The p tag represents a paragraph tag whereas the div tag represents a document tag.
You can write many paragraphs in a document tag, but you can't write a document in a paragraph. The same as a DOC file.
